For discussion · March 2026
Hal & Graham
We're not a marketplace. We're the counterparty to both sides.
| Flexible Price | Fixed Price | |
|---|---|---|
| Customer gets | Cheaper quote. Pays any overages. We ensure builders are reasonable. | Premium quote. One guaranteed price. Any overrun is our risk. |
| We earn | 15% margin, always. Zero pricing risk. | 28% margin target. We absorb overruns. |
Revenue streams: 1. Construction margin · 2. Financing (via Kanda initially, own lending later) · 3. Future: insurance products, maintenance contracts
The model above makes us a principal contractor. The law treats us as the builder.
Sources: HSE CDM 2015 guidance, Consumer Rights Act 2015 Chapter 4, GOV.UK CIS Guide
We're legally on the hook for everything - quality, safety, and delivery. This isn't optional.
Based on 10 hypothetical roofing jobs with realistic cost variance. 50/50 flexible/fixed split. No financing revenue in base case.
| Flexible | Customer pays overages. We always earn 15%. | £11,849 P&L / 10 jobs |
| Fixed | One guaranteed price. We absorb overruns. | £16,583 P&L / 10 jobs |
| Blended | 50/50 split | £14,216 / 10 jobs |
| Founders (x2) | £16,666 |
| Builder hire (all-in) | £6,200 |
| Overheads (inc. insurance) | £5,500 |
| Total | £28,366/mo |
At 30 jobs/month steady state. No financing revenue - see Kanda slide for why.
Ramp period not modelled. Months 1-6 are pre-revenue. Months 7-18 are partial volume. Steady state is month 19+. Financing revenue excluded from base case.
Same 10 jobs, four overrun scenarios. Flexible-tier jobs always make money (customer pays overages) - they contribute £11,849 per 10 jobs in every scenario. Only the fixed tier changes.
| Scenario | Fixed P&L (10 jobs) | Blended P&L (10 jobs) | Per-job contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current model | £16,583 | £14,216 | £1,022 |
| Optimistic fewer overruns | £21,572 | £16,711 | £1,271 |
| Pessimistic two major overruns | £13,770 | £12,810 | £881 |
| Nightmare three blow-ups | £10,473 | £11,161 | £716 |
Our best guess, not a forecast. Team sizes are bottom-up. Key assumption: one ops person manages ~30 active jobs with AI-automated comms and scheduling (vs ~12 without). This is testable in month one.
| Construction gross profit | ~£1.7M |
| Lending book | ~£10M outstanding |
| Spread income | ~£300k/yr |
| Team | 6-7 people |
| 2 founders + ops lead + 2 regional ops + 1 admin | |
| Opex | ~£550k |
| CAC (£350/job) | ~£420k |
| Net | ~£1M |
| Net margin | ~9% |
| Construction gross profit | ~£2.9M |
| Lending book | £30M+ |
| Spread income | ~£900k/yr |
| Team | 9-10 people |
| + 4 regional ops, quality/compliance, finance | |
| Opex | ~£750k |
| CAC (£300/job) | ~£720k |
| Net | ~£2.3M |
| Net margin | ~13% |
Scenario assumptions, not forecasts. Key unknown: jobs per ops person with AI automation. At 30/person we need the teams above. At 15/person, double them.
The previous slide is the disciplined version. Here's what it looks like if we raise more and move faster.
| Year 3 | Year 5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 400 jobs/mo | 800+ jobs/mo |
| Trades / regions | 3 / 4-5 | 4-5 / national |
| Revenue | £38M | £70-80M |
| Construction GP | £5.7M | £10-12M |
| Lending + insurance | £1.2M | £3.5-5M |
| Team | 12-14 | 19-22 |
| 4-5 regional ops leads + quality + finance + marketing + tech | ||
| Opex | £1.2M | £2M |
| CAC | £1.4M | £2.9M |
| Net | £4.3M | £8.6-12M |
| Margin | ~11% | 12-15% |
How we think about customer financing - and why it's a two-stage play.
Nobody offers fixed-price managed construction. Not in the UK. Not globally.
Evidence from MoneySavingExpert, Reddit, consumer forums.
| Self-employed income | £30k-60k/yr |
| Day rates | £200-350 |
| Gross margins | 25-40% |
It lets a team of 5-10 execute at the speed that would normally require 50+.
The competitive edge isn't "we have AI." It's "we execute at much lower fixed cost than anyone in this space, because AI handles the work that normally requires headcount."
A working prototype that generates instant two-tier quotes from a postcode.
The closest anyone has come to our model. A multi-billion dollar company. They failed.
Angi launched "Angi Services": fixed-price, managed model, act as principal, dispatch subcontractors, guarantee price and quality.
Failure mode: quality control. Dispatching subs you don't closely manage means you own every bad outcome.
Most construction tech founders don't have any of this. The financial architecture of this business is what we're genuinely good at.
Split into what we decide together and what we need to figure out.
Hal & Graham · March 2026